Pages
-
Recent Posts
- Integrity rules
- Did European pig-welfare legislation reduce pig welfare? Perhaps not, but experts confirm that common indestructible materials are not proper enrichment for pigs at all, except perhaps for an enhanced novel branched-chains design.
- How can we feed the world?
- Towards a common conceptual framework and illustrative model for feather pecking in poultry and tail biting in pigs – 1. Introduction
- Towards a common conceptual framework and illustrative model for feather pecking in poultry and tail biting in pigs – 2. Terminology
- Towards a common conceptual framework and illustrative model for feather pecking in poultry and tail biting in pigs – 3. Overview
- Towards a common conceptual framework and illustrative model for feather pecking in poultry and tail biting in pigs – 4. Farmer as a risk factor
- Towards a common conceptual framework and illustrative model for feather pecking in poultry and tail biting in pigs – 5. Models
- Towards a common conceptual framework and illustrative model for feather pecking in poultry and tail biting in pigs – 6. Disease framework
- Towards a common conceptual framework and illustrative model for feather pecking in poultry and tail biting in pigs – 7. Evolution and domestication
Categories
Tags
- Aggression
- Animals
- animal welfare
- Art
- Branched chains
- Broilers
- Cannibalism
- Circular
- Concept
- Conceptual framework
- Constraints
- Cruelty
- CV
- Deer
- Disruptive thinking
- Editor responsibilities
- Farmer
- Gentle feather pecking
- Golden Rule
- Health
- Humans
- Importance
- In memoriam
- Integrity
- Literature
- Livestock
- Model
- Needs
- Objectives
- Paper
- personal
- Pigs
- Project
- References
- Risk factor
- Scientific reviewing
- Scoring
- Severe feather pecking
- Species
- Sustainability
- Tail biting
- Terminology
- Transparency
- Treatment
- Vent pecking
Archives
Ads:
Author Archives: Marc
Protected: Panda
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
Protected: Semantic modelling
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
Protected: Ethics of scientific reviewing
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
Posted in Ethics
Tagged Editor responsibilities, Golden Rule, Paper, Scientific reviewing
Enter your password to view comments.
Strategic handling of conflicting values
This article is not available in English yet. Please see Strategisch omgaan met conflicterende waarden (password protected post).
Disclaimer, copy rights, privacy and cookie policy
Disclaimer This is my personal website. All content is personal, rather than professional, and all content is time-dependent, i.e. over time my personal opinions may change. Visitors of this website are themselves responsible for the way they use (the information … Continue reading
PigChase
* PigChase – playing with pigs. Imaginary, futuristic enrichment for pigs
