Pages
-
Recent Posts
- Integrity rules
- Did European pig-welfare legislation reduce pig welfare? Perhaps not, but experts confirm that common indestructible materials are not proper enrichment for pigs at all, except perhaps for an enhanced novel branched-chains design.
- How can we feed the world?
- Towards a common conceptual framework and illustrative model for feather pecking in poultry and tail biting in pigs – 1. Introduction
- Towards a common conceptual framework and illustrative model for feather pecking in poultry and tail biting in pigs – 2. Terminology
- Towards a common conceptual framework and illustrative model for feather pecking in poultry and tail biting in pigs – 3. Overview
- Towards a common conceptual framework and illustrative model for feather pecking in poultry and tail biting in pigs – 4. Farmer as a risk factor
- Towards a common conceptual framework and illustrative model for feather pecking in poultry and tail biting in pigs – 5. Models
- Towards a common conceptual framework and illustrative model for feather pecking in poultry and tail biting in pigs – 6. Disease framework
- Towards a common conceptual framework and illustrative model for feather pecking in poultry and tail biting in pigs – 7. Evolution and domestication
Categories
Tags
- Aggression
- Animals
- animal welfare
- Art
- Branched chains
- Broilers
- Cannibalism
- Circular
- Concept
- Conceptual framework
- Constraints
- Cruelty
- CV
- Deer
- Disruptive thinking
- Editor responsibilities
- Farmer
- Gentle feather pecking
- Golden Rule
- Health
- Humans
- Importance
- In memoriam
- Integrity
- Literature
- Livestock
- Model
- Needs
- Objectives
- Paper
- personal
- Pigs
- Project
- References
- Risk factor
- Scientific reviewing
- Scoring
- Severe feather pecking
- Species
- Sustainability
- Tail biting
- Terminology
- Transparency
- Treatment
- Vent pecking
Archives
Ads:
Tag Archives: Objectives
How would I spend 10 billion to improve the Netherlands? I’d burn it.
How would I spend 10 billion € to improve the Netherlands? NRC newspaper asked readers to write a short answer to this question. This is my answer: Seven opinionators already gave their answer (NRC 16 aug, 2017). Each had a … Continue reading
Posted in Ethics, Future, Geen categorie, Happiness, Justice, Money, Objectives, Politics
Tagged animal welfare, Disruptive thinking, Editor responsibilities, Integrity, Objectives
Leave a comment
How (not) to excel in doing well?
Well, well, well People sometimes think we are rational animals. Like animals we behave, but unlike animals we have the capacity to behave (more) rationally. And not just that: with rationality comes our more or less unique capacity of being … Continue reading
Posted in Art, Constraints, Semantics
Tagged animal welfare, Disruptive thinking, Humans, Objectives
Leave a comment
Happiness: Fact or fiction – Good or bad?
Happiness Today is the UN’s International Day of Happiness. Skandinavian countries, Switserland, Australia, Canada and the Netherlands are among the happiest countries in the world. Over the past year, the large majority (88%) of Dutch people were happy, i.e. they … Continue reading
Towards long(er) pig tails: New strategy to solve animal welfare problems
Bracke, M.B.M. 2010. Towards long(er) pig tails: New strategy to solve animal welfare problems. In: Lidfors, L., Blokhuis, H., Keeling, L., Proceedings of the 44th Congress of the ISAE, August 4-7 2010, Uppsala, Sweden, p. 135. Despite a considerable scientific … Continue reading
Disclaimer, copy rights, privacy and cookie policy
Disclaimer This is my personal website. All content is personal, rather than professional, and all content is time-dependent, i.e. over time my personal opinions may change. Visitors of this website are themselves responsible for the way they use (the information … Continue reading
