Pages
-
Recent Posts
- Integrity rules
- Did European pig-welfare legislation reduce pig welfare? Perhaps not, but experts confirm that common indestructible materials are not proper enrichment for pigs at all, except perhaps for an enhanced novel branched-chains design.
- How can we feed the world?
- Pig animation – Improved, branched chain design as proper enrichment for pigs
- An essential element of sustainable, circular farming: Integrity & a circular welfare economy
- How would I spend 10 billion to improve the Netherlands? I’d burn it.
- Future of intensive livestock farming: R.I.P?
- Reflection on running science as a business
- How (not) to excel in doing well?
- Publications on AMI sensors
Categories
Tags
- Agriculture
- Animals
- animal welfare
- Art
- Branched chains
- Circular
- Constraints
- Cruelty
- CV
- Deer
- Disruptive thinking
- Editor responsibilities
- Ethics
- Farming
- Fattening pigs
- Floor-directed behaviour
- food
- Golden Rule
- Growing pigs
- Humans
- In memoriam
- Integrity
- Introduction
- Livestock
- Needs
- Novelty
- Objectives
- Paper
- Paradigm
- personal
- Pigs
- Project
- Rooting
- Scientific reviewing
- Sows
- Species
- Sustainability
- Transparency
- Weaned pigs
- Welfare score
Archives
Ads:
Tag Archives: Scientific reviewing
Do pigs play with chains? Science versus society
Abstract Scientists object to the suggestion that pigs may be playing with toys like metal chains in their pen. In ordinary language, however, it is perfectly fine to use the word play for such animal-material interaction. Apparently, the word ‘play’ … Continue reading
Posted in Experts, Public, Science, Semantics
Tagged animal welfare, personal, Scientific reviewing
6 Comments
Expert elicitation in animal welfare risk assessment – methods and limitations
Bracke, M.B.M. 2010. Expert elicitation in animal welfare risk assessment – methods and limitations. In: Lidfors, L., Blokhuis, H., Keeling, L., Proceedings of the 44th Congress of the ISAE, Uppsala, Sweden, August 4-7 2010, p. 237 (Invited presentation for the … Continue reading
Protected: Semantic modelling
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
Protected: Ethics of scientific reviewing
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
Posted in Ethics
Tagged Editor responsibilities, Golden Rule, Paper, Scientific reviewing
Enter your password to view comments.
